<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Portland FMPug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland</link>
	<description>Another Great FMPug.com Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Productive Computing by Chiyoko</title>
		<link>http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/2010/09/28/productive-computing/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Chiyoko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/?p=55#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Wish I could have been there. All sounds super fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish I could have been there. All sounds super fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Angelo Luchi:Hosting by Allen</title>
		<link>http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/2010/02/23/angelo-luchihosting/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/?p=44#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Sadly, I had to leave early. Useful topic and fun/informative presentation! One question I hoped would be addressed was client-side files. For WAN FM server/client deployment, what kind of benefits (performance) and costs (difficulty upgrading...) do people see in hosting the data on the server and connecting from UI files installed on each client machine? It's been suggested that this approach improves performance where the UI file is complex (visually - lots of graphics - or in terms of scripts &#38; RG), but in my experience the performance benefit is less than I'd expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, I had to leave early. Useful topic and fun/informative presentation! One question I hoped would be addressed was client-side files. For WAN FM server/client deployment, what kind of benefits (performance) and costs (difficulty upgrading&#8230;) do people see in hosting the data on the server and connecting from UI files installed on each client machine? It&#8217;s been suggested that this approach improves performance where the UI file is complex (visually - lots of graphics - or in terms of scripts &amp; RG), but in my experience the performance benefit is less than I&#8217;d expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Angelo Luchi:Hosting by mnavarre</title>
		<link>http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/2010/02/23/angelo-luchihosting/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>mnavarre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/?p=44#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Here is Angelo's original description:

Deployment is a critical step in the success of your solution. In this session Angelo will explore the various methodologies for FileMaker Application deployment and help you determine which one(s) are appropriate for a given situation. He’ll be covering Citrix, Hosting, In-House Server, IWP,PHP. He will explore some benefits and issues with each process.
He’ll also be talking a bit about a new service that he’s offering through his hosting business that can help you or your client deploy through Citrix quickly, easily and economically.
Angelo Luchi is a 10+ year veteran developer of FileMaker software. In that time he has been building enterprise FileMaker applications, innovative web applications, integrating FileMaker with Web Services, and building a reliable FileMaker hosting infrastructure. Angelo is the owner of The Drooling Dog, LLC, a Seattle based company providing FileMaker and Web development as well as a multitude of hosting options, to the community. He offers coast to coast server availability and now Citrix XenApp hosting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is Angelo&#8217;s original description:</p>
<p>Deployment is a critical step in the success of your solution. In this session Angelo will explore the various methodologies for FileMaker Application deployment and help you determine which one(s) are appropriate for a given situation. He’ll be covering Citrix, Hosting, In-House Server, IWP,PHP. He will explore some benefits and issues with each process.<br />
He’ll also be talking a bit about a new service that he’s offering through his hosting business that can help you or your client deploy through Citrix quickly, easily and economically.<br />
Angelo Luchi is a 10+ year veteran developer of FileMaker software. In that time he has been building enterprise FileMaker applications, innovative web applications, integrating FileMaker with Web Services, and building a reliable FileMaker hosting infrastructure. Angelo is the owner of The Drooling Dog, LLC, a Seattle based company providing FileMaker and Web development as well as a multitude of hosting options, to the community. He offers coast to coast server availability and now Citrix XenApp hosting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meeting Location by Kent</title>
		<link>http://fmpug.com/blogs/portland/about/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Nice job on setting this up, Andy!

-Kent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job on setting this up, Andy!</p>
<p>-Kent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

